Quantitative Analysis of Watershed Hydrology for Kandar Dam (Kohat) using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) Techniques

Aftab Ahmad Khan, Jan Muhammad, Gul Daraz Khan, Muhammad Ijaz, Muhammad Adnan

Abstract


Watershed management plays a significant role in water assets engineering and management. Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographical Information System (GIS) techniques provide an effective solution to manage data that signify the hydrological features of the watershed. Determination of high accuracy and imagining topographic features of the earth’s surface is very vital for studying environmental applications at a local level. Land Use Land Cover (LULC) classifications is one of the most important methods of remote sensing and it is also a prime input for hydrological models. Estimation of peak runoff and total runoff volume is always required for hydrological planning. Estimation of runoff is difficult if the catchment area and its characteristics are not known. Determination of catchment area and its boundary is a tedious job through use of simple contour maps. This study was conducted to assess the accuracy and utilization of Advanced Space borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Model (ASTERGDEM) and Arc Hydro tools for watershed delineation and catchment area calculation. Furthermore, LULC classes were determined and Weighted Curve Number (WCN) was estimated. The elevations predicted by ASTER GDEM were compared with the elevations of established benchmarks at the watershed. It was then utilized as an input to Arc Hydro tools for watershed delineation. SPOT data (image) of the study site was classified through Supervised Classification in a remote sensing tool, ERDAS Imagine 9.1. Supervised classes were then compared with observed classes. A strong correlation was found between ASTER GDEM and observed benchmarks elevations (R= 0.83with 95 % confidence level). The resultant projected boundaries of watershed obtained, were in a close relevance to observed Global Positioning System (GPS) data. However, its projected catchment area was 71.61 km2instead of 72.31 km2. The overall user accuracy of classification was 94.23 % with overall Kappa (K^) coefficient value of 93.WCN was found to be 76.42 for the mentioned catchment area. It was concluded that ASTER GDEM and Arc Hydro tools are recommended for hydrological processing of small watersheds and SPOT data is good for LULC classification.


Full Text:

Untitled

References


Abdal-Magid, 20007: H. I. M. GIS-based Hydrological Modelling for Darfur Region.2007. M.Sc. thesis. Khartoum: College of Graduate Studies, Sudan University of Science and Technology (SUST).

Ames, D., E. Rafn, R. V. Kirk, and B. Crosby, 2009: Estimation of stream channelgeometry in Idaho using GIS-derived watershed characteristics. Environ Model Softw 24(3):444–448.

Anderson, J.R., E. E. Hardy, J. T.Roach, and R. E. Witmer, 1976: A Land Use and Land Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA.

Congalton, R. G., 1991: A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 37, 35–46.

Elaalem, M. M., Y. D. Ezlit, Elfghi, and A. Abushnaf, 2013: Performance of Supervised Classification for Mapping Land Cover and Land Use in Jeffara Plain of Libya. In International Conference on Food and Agricultural Sciences (Vol. 55).

ESRI, 2004: Arc hydro tools overview. ESRI, United States of America.

Fairfield, J., and P. Leymarie, 1991: Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resource Res 27(5):709–717.

Foody, G. M., 2002: Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 80, 185–201.

Jenson, S., 1991: Applications of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation models. Hydrol Process 5(1):31–44.

Jones, R., 2002: Algorithms for using a DEM for mapping catchment areas ofstream sediment samples* 1. Comput & Geosciences 28(9):1051–1060.

Konadu, D., and C. Fosu, 2009: Digital Elevation Models and GIS for Watershed Modelling and Flood Prediction -A Case Study of Accra Ghana. In Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Protection in the Developing World. Springer, pp 325–332.

Lacroix, M., L. Martz, G. Kite and J. Garbrecht, 2002: Using digital terrain analysis modeling techniques for the parameterization of a hydrologic model.Environ Model Softw 17(2):125–134.

Lin, W. T., W. C. Chou, C. Y. Lin, P. H. Huang and J. S. Tsai, 2008: WinBasin: using improved algorithms and the GIS technique for automated watershed modelling analysis from digital elevation models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(1/2):47–69.

Liu, C. F., L. P. Kumar, 2007: Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ. 107, 606–616.

Merkel, W., R. Kaushika, and E. Gorman, 2008: NRCS GeoHydro–A GIS interface for hydrologic modeling. Comput & Geosciences 34(8):918–930.

Moharana, P., and A. Kar, 2002: Watershed simulation in a sandy terrain of the Thar desert using GIS. J Arid Environ 51(4):489–500.

RemcoJ, J. D., 2005: Hydrologic Information as a Support tool for water quality monitoring a thesis Submitted to ITC, Netherland.

Richards, J. A., 2013: Supervised classification techniques. In Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis (pp. 247-318). Springer BerlinHeidelberg.

SCS, 1986: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. United State Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service TR-55, Second Ed. (6):210.

Smits, P.C., S. G. Dellepaine, and R. A. Schowengerdt, 1999: Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land cover mapping: a review and a proposal for a cost based approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 1461–1486.

Turcotte, R., J. Fortin, A. Rousseau, S. Massicotte, and J. Villeneuve, 2001: Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using a digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network. J Hydrol 240(3–4):225–242.

Wu, S., J. Li, and G. Huang, 2008: A study on DEM-derived primary topographic attributes for hydrologic applications: sensitivity to elevation data resolution. Appl Geogr 28(3):210–223.

Zhang, H., and G. Huang, 2009: Building channel networks for flat regions in digital elevation models. Hydrol Process 23(20):2879–2887.

Zhang, H., G. H. Huang, and D. Wang, 2013: Establishment of channel networks in adigital elevation model of the prairie region through hydrological correction and geomorphological assessment. Can Water Resources J 38(1):12–23.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.